This study compares the concept of 'correctness' in the middle and early modern period with that in northwestern Eurasia and Christian regions. As the result, following points were clarified. (1) Interpretation of the spirit, violence and majority rule is the key point, (2) the background of differences in "correct recognition" among countries is differences in acceptance of the Bible and humanities knowledge, (3) critical reexamination of the theory of "de-magicization" is necessary, and (4) when "correctness" is used to justify a modern state and becomes a resiliency, one closes oneself and stops being "correct recognition," but when "correctness" = orthodoxy, which requires a theological existence, it is always overwritten by the relationship with others and develops into an abstract "correct recognition."
